SDD Layout Design

Below is the version 5 design for the Scotts-dale Division Layout. This track plan is designed to fit in my current basement, although it requires modifications to the existing train room and storage area. It is also designed as a "phased" layout with construction an operations starting on one deck and the other deck added at a later date  The entire track plan covers  different type of coal hauling operations from mine to port and power plant.

The goal of this layout is to provide both mainline and mine turn operations. The concept of operations is that the yard at Scotts-dale is the principal marshalling yard. Mine turns are dispatched from Scotts-dale to mines, 3 on the main line and 6 on the branch line. Mainline operations are primarily moving empties from the port and power plant to Scotts-dale, then returning with loads received from the mine turns. Some unit coal trains will be operated as well. For a little variety, intermodal trains will run to and from the port. Also occasional freight trains, roadrailers, and even an Amtrak train will run. Operations are centered around coal movements and could keep four to eight folks busy for a while.  There is sufficient mainline and branch line running to operate both mine turns on the branch and movements to the port, in addition some unit trains could be run directly.  The yard at Scotts-dale would be a very busy place. A cut-out for Roanoke Staging has been added in the transition area, which should help the operational feel of some trains.

The construction of the layout provides for a three phase approach. Phase I focuses on the mainline operations between Scotts-dale and Elkhorn Tunnel. Staging would be used to simulate mine turn operations at first. Phase II adds upper deck and mine turn operations. Phase III adds the port of Norfolk. The approach allows Phases I and II to be built and made operation in the currently finished part of the basement, before starting construction in the unfinished portion. Thus a reasonably large and operational layout can be built before pouring train money into home improvements.

The size of the layout might be a challenge, but the phased construction approach should mitigate part of the challenge. Still, the size allows for great opportunities for operations, yet the resulting layout is far larger than any previous layout that I've attempted. It raises concern that the design might be a layout that is too big, it could be either too expensive to build or too difficult to maintain.  Thus, while I consider this version as my "Ideal" layout, I will likely start working on a smaller version that captures the same basic operations.

An detailed version of the layout is available by clicking on the image.

An detailed version of the layout is available by clicking on the image.